<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>My Blog Articles on KI-Codex.ai (EN)</title><link>/en/blog/</link><description>Recent content in My Blog Articles on KI-Codex.ai (EN)</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2026 19:38:00 +0100</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="/en/blog/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>GEMA VS. THE AI TITANS (SUNO.AI &amp; OPENAI): AI MUSIC IN COURT – AND WHY THIS IS JUST THE BEGINNING</title><link>/en/blog/ki-und-recht/gema-urteile-ki/</link><pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2026 19:38:00 +0100</pubDate><guid>/en/blog/ki-und-recht/gema-urteile-ki/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Author: Jens Henneberg&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;As of: 2026-03-11 - 09:47&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Courtroom 270, Munich Palace of Justice, March 9, 2026. Music is playing, but no one is dancing. Six songs, two worlds: first the original, then the machine&amp;rsquo;s derivative. Forever Young, Atemlos, Mambo No. 5. Judge Elke Schwager listens. The same woman who handed down the landmark OpenAI ruling four months earlier now faces the question: Did Suno violate the rights of the composers and lyricists? Or is Suno&amp;rsquo;s AI training and music generation legal?&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>